Sold Out
Book Categories |
Title: Home economics
WonderClub
Item Number: 9780850976076
Number: 1
Product Description: Home economics
Universal Product Code (UPC): 9780850976076
WonderClub Stock Keeping Unit (WSKU): 9780850976076
Rating: 3/5 based on 2 Reviews
Image Location: https://wonderclub.com/images/covers/60/76/9780850976076.jpg
Weight: 0.200 kg (0.44 lbs)
Width: 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Heigh : 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Depth: 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Date Added: August 25, 2020, Added By: Ross
Date Last Edited: August 25, 2020, Edited By: Ross
Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
$99.99 | Digital |
| WonderClub (9290 total ratings) |
Chris Emory
reviewed Home economics on November 11, 2008I recently read Home Economics by Wendell Berry for either the second or third time. I am a Berry fan and this is one of his best books, in my opinion. It contains fourteen essays on a variety of subjects including national defense, higher education, and the family farm. He speaks from where he is: a farmer dedicated to the preservation of sustainable agriculture. This does not mean that he speaks only to those like him. In fact I see his wide appeal as one of his main strengths. His message begins with the farm but extrapolates to a national and international level. He is obviously widely read and has created a cohesive and (to me) convincing view of our world.
His writing style is clear and at times funny. He is emotional without being maudlin; respectful of the past without sentimentalizing it. He is realistic without being pessimistic.
I do not always entirely agree with him. At times he skirts a little too close to pantheism for my taste. While I agree for the most part with his assessment of higher education I feel that ignoring the smaller private university in some measure reduces the impact of his argument when he discusses higher education. However, I recognize that the main thrust of this discussion is based on the state supported public universities.
All in all, I find Berry's world view and writing most refreshing and convincing. Home Economics is an excellent read for anyone although most especially those interested in agriculture.
"It is this balance of the natural and the human that makes a landscape look comfortable and comforting, and this is the work of an old kind of mind, of long attention and familiarity--a mind as different as possible from the industrial or moder mind, which comes into a place, aware only of its own demands, imposing its own geometry."
~Wendell Berry, Home Economics, "Irish Journal"
"Education in the true sense, of course, is an enablement to serve--both the living human community in its natural household or neighborhood and the precious cultural possessions that the living community inherits or should inherit."
~Wendell Berry, Home Economics, "Higher Education and Home Defense"
Robert Cundiff
reviewed Home economics on June 27, 2016Interesting topic. His assertion of the relationship between community and economy are what interested me the most. Berry poses the question of whether communities have a value other than emotional value because, according to him, community is a concept no one bothers to quarrel with. He asserts the modern thought is that we are better off with corporate industries, therefore communities are run under the assumption they have no real value. Berry, however, believes otherwise. Using the experience from two friends, Loyce and Owen Flood, Berry provides an example of what he believes to be an ideal community. The Floods' community from 1938 was autonomous, the elders conveyed practical skills and knowledge to the young, and they did not depend on financiers or big corporations in order to subsist. He claims communities like this have ceased to exist and this is a huge loss for him. He proceeds to argue about how we should have more ideal economies like the Floods', and to an extent I wouldn't exactly agree if we grafted certain qualities from said community, but I wouldn't oppose it either. I just really wouldn't care. I feel in this age it's not necessary to have huge, united communities. It shouldn't be an obligation, which is what Berry sometimes implies. I don't want to get to know my neighbours simply because I am completely fine being on my own. Do I expect them to aid me by calling the authorities if they heard me, or someone from my family, scream my lungs off? Yes. The same way I expect them to expect me to call the authorities if I heard a serious disturbance in their home! But that is the only neighbourliness I want and need. I don't want to get to know them simply because in the digital age, a community bordered on zero technology to help themselves and merely scrap by because they think unity is all they need is not necessary. Berry wants a community from 1938 to be the standard community of 2016. How is this logical? (Mind you, this book was published on 1987, but Berry still stands by what he has said on this book today)
Don't get me wrong--I agree people should become more autonomous, I do believe we should rely less on big corporations. But I don't believe we need communities like Berry's ideal one. Take into account Berry is a guy who despises technology--he has no refrigerators, no computers and basically refrains himself from using anything technological which has advanced the human species. He uses solar panels because he doesn't want to support the power industry, which I admire and concur with. But I do not agree with depriving yourself from things which are necessary in the digital age. I do not think it is a viable form of living for the common denominator and families caught up in the day-to-day. Berry claims in one of his chapters that people call him a sentimental guy for wanting the 1938 community back and refutes that he is not. But honestly? I think he is. I think he's nostalgic, and this nostalgia prevents him from accepting the technological advancement of mankind. I don't agree with this.
In overall, yes, this was interesting. It was a different perspective albeit a sometimes irrational one. I feel that in many ways Berry is very subjective, though his whole goal is to be as objective as possible. I don't agree with the heart of this argument and his way of living, but it works for him. I just don't like the pietistic, oftentimes aloof tone he conveys to the reader. It's one thing to use a tone that implies you mean business, but it's a completely different thing to use a tone which criticises and judges your reader. One of the most important things, if not the most important thing, in academic writing is building common ground with your reader. You achieve this with a non-judgemental tone and I think Berry fails in this aspect, which crumbles his point to many people and may not make them want to read what he has to say.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your CollectionHome economics
X
This Item is in Your InventoryHome economics
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
Add Home economics, , Home economics to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Home economics, , Home economics to your collection on WonderClub |