Sold Out
Book Categories |
At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the "sophistical" arguments offered by the Sophists — who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and the justifications they offer for their decisions are a vital means by which citizens can assess the legitimacy of how that power is exercised. However, to evaluate judicial justifications requires close attention to the method of reasoning behind decisions. This new collection illuminates and explains the political and moral importance in justifying the exercise of judicial power.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionPrecedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
X
This Item is in Your InventoryPrecedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts, At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the sophistical arguments offered by the Sophists — who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and th, Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts, At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the sophistical arguments offered by the Sophists — who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and th, Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts to your collection on WonderClub |