Sold Out
Book Categories |
About the Authors | ||
Pt. I | Origins and Underpinnings | |
1 | Beginnings and Introduction | 3 |
Pt. II | The Oregon Teacher Work Sample Methodology | |
2 | The Oregon Teacher Work Sample Methodology: Rationale and Background | 11 |
3 | Teacher Work Sample Methodology as Used at Western Oregon State College | 15 |
4 | Oregon Teacher Work Sample Methodology: Potential and Problems | 46 |
5 | Oregon Teacher Work Sample Methodology: Educational Policy Review | 53 |
6 | Reflections on Comments by Airasian and Stufflebeam | 62 |
Pt. III | The Dallas Value-Added Accountability System | |
7 | In the Beginning | 75 |
8 | The Dallas Value-Added Accountability System | 81 |
9 | Value-Added Productivity Indicators: The Dallas System | 100 |
10 | On Trial: The Dallas Value-Added Accountability System | 110 |
11 | Little Practical Difference and Pie in the Sky: A Response to Thum and Bryk and a Rejoinder to Sykes | 120 |
Pt. IV | The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System | |
12 | The Impetus for the Tennessee Value-Added Accountability System | 133 |
13 | The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System: A Quantitative, Outcomes-Based Approach to Educational Assessment | 137 |
14 | The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System: A Challenge to Familiar Assessment Methods | 163 |
15 | Assessment Requires Incentives to Add Value: A Review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System | 169 |
16 | Response to the Reviewers | 179 |
Pt. V | The Kentucky Instructional Results Information System | |
17 | Historical Background: The Kentucky School Accountability Index | 185 |
18 | Kentucky's Accountability and Assessment Systems | 191 |
19 | Measurement Quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System, 1991-1994 | 210 |
20 | Overview and Assessment of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System | 219 |
21 | The Kentucky Instructional Results Information System Meets the Critics: A Little Light and Much Heat | 228 |
Pt. VI | Synthesis and Perspectives | |
22 | How Do I Judge Thee? Let Me Count the Ways | 243 |
23 | Toward What End? The Evaluation of Student Learning for the Improvement of Teaching | 248 |
24 | The Moth and the Flame: Student Learning as a Criterion of Instructional Competence | 264 |
Author Index | 275 | |
Subject Index | 278 |
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionGrading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure?
X
This Item is in Your InventoryGrading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure?
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Grading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure?, In an extensive review of teacher and school evaluation, one is not likely to find an issue more divisive than the question of how best, in high-stakes contexts, to evaluate how well teachers and schools accomplish their task of educating students. Thi, Grading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure? to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Grading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure?, In an extensive review of teacher and school evaluation, one is not likely to find an issue more divisive than the question of how best, in high-stakes contexts, to evaluate how well teachers and schools accomplish their task of educating students. Thi, Grading Teachers, Grading Schools: Is Student Achievement a Valid Evaluation Measure? to your collection on WonderClub |