Epistemetrics Book

Plantinga makes enormous assumptions about the nature of truth, the reliability of our senses, memory, the nature of logic and mathematics, he ignores historical developments, and his reasoning from analogy is comically flawed.

This is painful to read.

There are moments where he realizes how shaky the ground he is building upon is. But instead of realizing it means he should abandon the project (vis-a-vis reductio ad absurdum) he pushes on.

He has convinced me that any philosophical attempt to explain knowledge needs to incorporate the findings of psychology. Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Locke, Descartes, etc did not have recourse to such a discipline. Plantinga has no such excuse, except to hide in an academic silo.

I do not think he establishes that warrant exists.

This is rubbish. From start to finish.