Aristotle : Selections Book

Compared to THE Complete Works of Aristotle by JONATHAN BARNES, Irwin & Fine's translations are somewhat more opaque, and one would get confused more easily. Here is an example:

Physics 190a22
Irwin & Fine
"We say that something comes to be F from being G, but not that the G comes to be F, more often in cases where G does not remain; for instance, we say that a man comes to be musical from being unmusical, but not that the unmusical comes to be musical from a man."
Barnes:
"We speak of ‘becoming that from this’ instead of ‘this becoming that’ more in the case of what does not survive the change—’becoming musical from unmusical’, not ‘from man’ "

Judge for yourselves which one makes better sense.

Also, many important sections are not included in the book, and you will be informed of this omission by this '*********************************' at the end of a passage; many of these omissions are in fact very important for explication of Aristotle's argument.

Still, you might consider this book for its exquisite Glossary.

TL:DR Read J.Barnes' translation together with this translation to save yourselves some hair-pulling.